Editorial Guest Placements for B2B SaaS and Fintech

A placement inside a quarterly engagement works out at about 2,900 euros, and none of that money reaches the publisher. I do not buy slots. When a site answers a pitch with a rate card, what it is selling is a paid link under Google's link spam policy: it belongs in rel="sponsored", it will not move a ranking, and I decline the site rather than dress the invoice up as content marketing. The writing is the product. I write the piece myself, in English or Spanish, under your byline or that of a named person at your company who can defend it in the comments. Subjects come out of your own arguments: the reconciliation break your finance team spends Mondays on, the SDK method you deprecated and the migration path you gave people, what an SCA exemption does to checkout completion in Spain. Editors at Xataka, Genbeta, InfoQ, The New Stack, LogRocket, Cinco Dias and Business Insider Espana take that pitch. Nobody takes a post about why content is king. How a publication qualifies: The section the piece would sit in has published something in the past thirty days that was not written by a vendor. The site has no "write for us" page quoting fees. The last five posts in that section are not all about marketing tools. Someone whose name appears on the masthead answers email. A shortlist for one quarter usually starts near forty candidates and finishes at five or six, and you see both lists, including the sites I threw out and the reason. The link: One link, placed where it belongs in the argument, with the anchor the sentence wants. I do not negotiate anchor text with editors, and I do not ask twice if an editor cuts the link. The piece stays up, your name stays on it, and that relationship outlasts the link. Roughly one placement in seven ends this way and it is priced in. Not included: No monthly link quota. No sites bought from another vendor's inventory. No press release wires, no syndication networks, no reporting built around Domain Rating movement. I will not ghostwrite an opinion your company does not hold, and I will not place a piece on a site your compliance team would be embarrassed to be cited by, which in regulated fintech rules out more targets than anything else. Who this is not for: Companies before their first customers, who have no operational detail to write from. Teams that need a fixed number of links per month for a board slide; that is bought elsewhere and cheaper. Anyone whose target page is a 200-word landing page, because a link into a page with nothing on it converts a placement into a wasted quarter. I would rather fix the page first, or send you to someone who will. What you get, and how it is judged: Every published piece, its URL, the editor's name, the pitch that won it, and the search demand around the subject on the day I chose it. Delivery is the published post, never the outreach volume behind it. Ninety days after a quarter closes I send a follow-up note: which placements still hold the link, which target pages moved, which subject lines got replies. That note is the part clients keep and reuse without me.