Terms-first outreach through to signed term sheets, benchmarked against deals actually signed in your category rather than published rate cards.
About this service
Where the gap between asking price and signed price actually sits:
An opening quote and a signed quote usually differ by twenty to forty percent, and almost none of that movement is haggling. It is scope. The first number a creator or their agent sends is priced against an imagined worst case: perpetual usage, category exclusivity, unlimited rounds of feedback, a legal review from a brand that has never told them what it wants. Take those four unknowns off the table in the first email with specific terms and the number moves before anyone argues about it. That is the whole method, and it is why we send terms rather than a rate request.
What we benchmark against:
Signed deals in your category, not published rate cards. A rate card is a negotiating position; the useful comparison is what comparable creators in kids and family, fintech and home actually accepted in the last two quarters for a similar rights term, on similar deliverables, in the same season. We hold that data because we negotiate continuously rather than in campaign bursts, and we will show you the comparison set behind any rate we recommend. Q4 in home and furniture is not Q2. A creator whose last three deals were exclusive is priced differently from one who has kept their category open.
What we put in the first message:
Deliverables with the cut lengths and the platforms named. Usage term, territory and media, stated in months rather than left to be discovered later. Exclusivity, if any, defined by category width and duration and priced as its own line. Feedback rounds, with a number on them. Payment terms and the invoice route. Approval turnaround from your side, which is a commitment we ask you to make in writing, because a brand that takes eleven days to approve a script pays for that eventually in every subsequent quote.
Working with agents:
Roughly half the creators worth booking in these categories are represented, and represented creators are easier, not harder, once the terms are concrete. Agents at the larger shops price for risk and for precedent, and a term they concede to you sets a floor for their next negotiation. That is why we treat most favored nation clauses as a real cost rather than a formality, why we would rather pay more on the fee than accept a rights term the agent will point to later, and why we do not open with a number designed to be knocked down.
What we refuse:
Template outreach at volume. It is answered by the creators with nothing booked and ignored by the ones you want. Gifting approaches to anyone with a paid history. Any suggestion that exposure, a repost from the brand account, or a future campaign forms part of the consideration. Renegotiating a rate downward after a creator has blocked the shoot date. And we will not press a creator to accept a rights grant we would advise a client not to accept in reverse, because the same creator will be across the table again next year and our name is on the email.
What you get:
A rate recommendation per creator with the comparison set behind it, sent to you before anyone is contacted. Outreach and negotiation run end to end from an address that carries your program rather than a generic agency alias. A signed term sheet per creator covering fee, deliverables, usage, exclusivity, revisions and dates, in a form your contracts team can paper without a second negotiation. A written record of every concession made and what it cost. And a note on the creators who declined, with the actual reason where they gave one, which is often the most useful page in the file.
Who this is not for:
Programs whose budget is set below the category floor, where our advice is to book fewer creators properly rather than many badly. Brands that want the negotiation used as a discovery exercise. And anyone who needs the rate benchmarks without the negotiation, which we do not sell separately.