Crypto Creator Placement With Disclosure Terms Enforced

We have paid a crypto creator 28,000 dollars for one thread and turned down a 900 dollar slot in the same week. Across 2025 placements, our median cost per wallet still active at day 30 was 41 dollars; the same buys, priced on impressions, would have looked identical to each other and told you nothing. Selection is the work. The rate card is an input to it. How we select: We pull the creator's last twenty paid placements and read what happened after each one, thirty days out, on chain where the promoted thing was on chain. That means holder counts, contract interactions and, where the promoted asset traded, the price path and who was selling into it. A creator whose promoted projects reliably show first-week distribution to the same fifteen wallets is not a reach problem, it is a conflict, and we will not place with them at any rate. Audience overlap comes second: we sample follower sets, resolve what we can against Farcaster identities and public wallet links, and estimate how much of the audience you already have. Mindshare tooling such as Kaito is used as a screen for who is being read this month, never as the target. Telegram placements require view logs and forward counts exported from the channel, not screenshots. YouTube requires the creator's own retention curve for two comparable videos; public view counts do not survive contact with a mid-roll. Terms we put in every contract: Named deliverable, format and publication window, with a defined revision path before publication rather than a takedown after. A disclosure label in the post itself, not in a reply and not in a bio. No deletion inside ninety days, since a deleted thread breaks the only record either of us has. An exclusivity window against directly competing placements, defined by category rather than by named competitor, because the named list is always incomplete. Payment split with a portion held against post-publication verification. Payment in stablecoins or fiat only. We do not pay creators in your token, ever: a creator holding your token has a reason to post and a stronger reason to sell, and every distribution chart we have read confirms it. Disclosure: The label is not negotiable and we will lose placements over it. For US-facing audiences that is the FTC endorsement guidance at 16 CFR Part 255. For India it is the ASCI influencer guidelines, and where anything reads as investment advice, SEBI's position on unregistered persons. We do not have a compliance opinion to sell you, but we will not book a creator who wants the label removed, and about one approach in six ends there. Outside scope: We do not manage your founder's account, write your posts or run your owned channels. We do not buy engagement, pods, quote-boosts or trending placement. We do not place with accounts whose operator's identity is unknown to us, even under NDA on our side only. We do not run price-linked incentives for creators, and we will not accept a brief whose success measure is a price move. Who this is not for: Projects that need coverage this week; selection takes ten to fourteen days before a single approach is made. Teams who want the slate handed over as a list of handles and rates, which is the deliverable most buyers ask for and the one that carries none of the value here. Anyone whose product is not live enough for a creator's audience to do something after reading. A placement pointed at a waitlist converts to a waitlist, and then you have paid creator rates for an email address. What you receive: The slate with the reasoning and the rejections, the contracts, the published posts, and a day-30 read on wallets or accounts attributed by placement, including the placements that returned nothing.