Meta ad account restriction diagnosis and appeal

Most restrictions we are called about are not about the ad. They are asset-level: an unverified business entity, a page whose quality score has been failing quietly for months, a domain still claimed by an agency you left in 2023, or an administrator whose personal profile was restricted years ago and who is now contaminating every asset they touch. Which of those you have decides everything about the appeal, and it is knowable. Within two working days we tell you which category you are in and what odds we would put on it, including the case where the honest answer is that this account is not coming back and the budget is better spent on the rebuild. The first 48 hours: We take read access, not admin, and go through account quality across every asset: ad account, page, Business Manager, pixel, domain, and the personal profiles holding admin rights. We read the actual restriction notice rather than the summary somebody relayed to you, check whether the citation references a policy your funnel genuinely breaches, and pull the full rejection history including the ones nobody escalated at the time. You then receive a written verdict: the category, the evidence behind it, the appeal we would file, and the probability we would attach to it. Filing: Appeals through Business Support Home are largely automated on the first pass, and an identical second appeal is worse than no appeal because it closes the path. So the first one has to be right. That means verification is completed before the appeal rather than after: business verification with documents whose legal name and organisation number match the Bolagsverket record exactly, domain verification by DNS TXT record, a payment method held by the same legal entity, and the offending page or funnel actually changed before we claim it has been. Where the account clears the spend threshold for a Meta partner manager we use that channel, and we tell you honestly what it can and cannot do. Rebuilding so it does not recur: Asset partitioning, so one restricted page cannot take a group down: separate Business Managers by market or brand, page roles held by the business rather than by named individuals, one administrator account whose only job is to hold administration, and no personal profile carrying assets for more than one company. Payment methods in the entity that owns the account. This is the part clients skip, and it is why we see the same company twice. What we refuse: We do not buy, rent, or introduce you to an agency Business Manager, a reinstated account, or a whitelisted asset. We do not cloak and we will not build a page that shows one thing to review and another to traffic. We do not appeal accounts restricted for the thing they were actually doing: if the landing page claims a health outcome nobody has substantiated, the fix is the landing page, and we will say that before you pay us rather than after. We do not guarantee reinstatement. If a guarantee is what you need in order to sign, we are the wrong firm and there is no version of this conversation where that changes. Who this is not for: Restricted categories looking for a route around the rules. Anyone whose product is itself the violation. And accounts already permanently disabled with a rejected appeal and no new evidence, where the only thing left to sell would be hope. What you receive: The written verdict with its evidence pack, the appeal as filed including the narrative, verification completed across business, domain and payment, an asset architecture diagram for the rebuild, and a policy review of the live funnel so that the next restriction is not already scheduled.